News
Trump’s promise to bring the administrative state to heel is a principled and necessary correction to decades of regulatory drift.
16hon MSN
T he U.S. Supreme Court has acted in a series of cases involving challenges to executive orders signed by President Donald ...
The role of a federal judge is now less about applying precedent than it is predicting which precedent the Court will ...
On July 23, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 vote, granted the Trump Administration’s request to stay a permanent injunction that had ...
19hOpinion
Dealbreaker on MSNSupreme Court To Lower Courts: Ignore Actual Binding Precedent, Follow Our Unexplained Shadow Docket Vibes InsteadThe Supreme Court’s shadow docket has become a lawless mess. The justices are issuing extremely consequential rulings with ...
A case involving the Consumer Product Safety Commission is the latest example of the Supreme Court policing the ability of ...
For the court’s conservative bloc, the line between upholding the Constitution and serving as Donald Trump’s personal ...
President Donald Trump has cast successes at the US Supreme Court as broad endorsements of his authority to fire agency heads ...
The Trump administration came once again to the Supreme Court on Thursday afternoon and asked the justices to pause an order ...
Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan on Thursday publicly chided her conservative colleagues for deciding -- at least ...
Discover Justice Elena Kagan's insights on judicial independence and the challenges facing SCOTUS judges in today's political ...
The Court's order is not particularly surprising given its prior order staying a similar injunction barring the removal of other appointees to independent agencies. The three justices appointed by ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results