A pen drive or a CCTV clip reaches the courtroom as a bare file. It looks the same whether it is genuine or edited. The law therefore needs a way to show that the file produced in court is the same ...
Judgments are often reversed on fact-finding errors, not on questions of law. A unanimous 2026 decision of the Caribbean Court of Justice (CCJ), Robateau v Robateau [2026] CCJ 15 (AJ) BZ, sets out a ...
In the present case, the sole foundation of the revisionist's claim of adultery is digital evidence in the form of Instagram chats. This brings the Court to the crucial aspect of the admissibility and ...
Ujjal Bhuyan and A.S. Chandurkar, JJ. Author: A.S. Chandurkar, J. 1. The Appellant1 on 25.10.2022 was riding his two-wheeler along with his brother when a mini truck being driven by the second ...
Moreover, the doctor who conducted autopsy on the dead body on 06.10.1979 at 4.30 p.m., in the report has mentioned that rigor mortis had passed through upper extremities and was present in lower ...
When a body is subjected to intense heat, such as in a fire, the skull's protective lining — the dura mater — reacts to the thermal assault. The heat causes the dura to contract and peel away from the ...
he has been charged with in the presence case. 3. Let the trial proceed further expeditiously. 4. The Trial Court shall see to it that the entire trial is completed within a period of six months from ...
5.1.1. While holding that the legal representatives of the deceased are entitled to move an application for compensation by virtue of clause (c) of Section 166 (1) of the Act, it was observed, “…The ...
principle that the Execution Court cannot go beyond a decree. A learned Single Judge of the High Court agreed with the direction to the Trial Court, to draw up a decree. Since the relief was not ...
commenced only in 1984, the law as on the date of proceedings should be applicable and the subject land which is in violation of the provisions of the Act as under Section 166 of the Abolition Act, ...
It is also settled law that mere marking of a document as an exhibit, is not a proof of the contents thereof. A Division Bench of this Court in LIC v. Ram Pal Singh Bisen2 had observed:{Para 11} “25.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results