A judge will soon decide if Google must sell Chrome to remedy its antitrust case. Competitors like Perplexity have already expressed interest.

The highly watched decision came after Google and the government proposed ways to fix the tech giant's monopoly over online ...

Google will not have to sell its Chrome browser in order to address its illegal monopoly in online search, DC District Court Judge Amit Mehta ruled on Tuesday. Over a year ago, Judge Mehta found that ...

A federal judge overseeing one of two antitrust cases involving Google says the tech giant will be allowed to keep its Chrome browser, but cannot forge search-related agreements with third parties on ...

A federal judge ordered Google to alter its search business in a landmark antitrust case but did not impose changes on the ...

U.S. District Judge Mehta ruled that Google can no longer pay partners to make its search engine available exclusively on ...

Google will have to give up search data to competitors but can keep Chrome and Android, a federal judge ruled in the landmark antitrust case.

A federal court’s remedies ruling allows Google to retain its Chrome browser and continue paying Apple billions for Safari search placement while recognizing the growing influence of generative AI on ...

Perplexity made an unsolicited $34.5 billion bid for Google's web browser and claims it has the backing to pull it off.

Chrome Canary now warns when clipboard access is revoked for inactive sites, giving users more control over copy-paste ...

DC District Court Judge Amit Mehta has ruled that Google doesn't have to give up the Chrome browser to mitigate its illegal monopoly in online search. The court will only require a handful of modest ...

The tech giant scores a partial victory that concludes a five-year US legal saga, but remedies on its adtech business monopoly are also imminent in a separate case.